One person, one entitlement, provably.
Every large disbursement programme faces the same two questions from whoever is funding it: is this person real, and are they on this list only once? Biolog answers both at enrolment, and again at every disbursement.
Applications
Beneficiary enrolment
Biometric capture with deduplication across the whole register, so the same individual cannot appear twice under two sets of biographic data.
Disbursement verification
The beneficiary verifies biometrically at collection. The disbursement record names a verified person, not a signature on a sheet.
Staff and payroll audit
Biometric verification exercises across an existing payroll, surfacing records with no corresponding human being.
Field operation
Handheld devices with offline capture for enrolment and verification in locations without reliable power or connectivity.
Reporting to funders
An audit trail that survives external scrutiny, because every entry is timestamped, located and attributed at the moment it happened.
The register is the deliverable
A programme is judged on whether its register holds. Deduplication at enrolment is what makes that possible; verification at disbursement is what keeps it true over time. Both run on the same record, which is why the audit trail reconciles rather than requiring reconciliation.
BTS works with Life Changers, an NGO client.
What a funder actually asks for
- How many unique individuals are on this register, and how do you know they are unique?
- Who verified each enrolment, at which location, on which device?
- What proportion of disbursements were verified biometrically at collection?
- Can any of the above be edited after the fact? — No.
See Biolog running against your own process.
A working session with our team, not a slide deck. Bring your enrolment volumes, your verification points and your awkward edge cases. We will show you how Biolog handles them.